Wax

WebAuthn library for elixir

Goal: implement a comprehensive FIDO2 library on the server side (Relying party or RP in the WebAuthn terminology) to authenticate users with WebAuthn.

For semantics (FIDO2, WebAuthn, FIDO...), read this article

Demo app

You can try out and study WebAuthn authentication with Wax thanks to the wax_demo test application.

See also a video demonstration of an authentication flow which allows replacing the password authentication scheme by a WebAuthn password-less authentication:

Demo screenshot

Project status

  • Support the FIDO2 standard (especially all types of attestation statement formats and all mandatory algorithms). See the "Support of FIDO2" section for further information
  • Passes all the 165 tests of the official test suite (tested using WaxFidoTestSuiteServer)
  • This library has not be reviewed by independent security / FIDO2 specialists - use it at your own risks or blindly trust its author!
  • This library does not come with a javascript library to handle WebAuthn calls

Compatibility

OTP22+

Installation

Add the following line to your list of dependencies in mix.exs:

def deps do
  [
    {:wax_, "~> 0.4.0"}
  ]
end

Note that due to a name collision, the application name is :wax_, and not :wax. It doesn't cause issues using both library because the other's package doesn't use the atom Wax as the base module name.

Documentation

Usage

To use FIDO2 for authentication, you must first register a new FIDO2 key for a user. The process is therefore the following:

  1. Register a FIDO2 key for a user
  2. Authenticate as much as you want the user using the FIDO2 key registered in step 1

Optionaly, you might want to store more than one key, for instance if the user have several authenticators.

The Wax library doesn't provide with a user data store to store the key generated in step 1 and to retrieve it in step 2. Instead, it lets you use any data store. The data to be stored is described in the Wax module's documentation.

Registration

Wax provides with 2 functions for registration:

  1. Wax.new_registration_challenge/1: generates a challenge that must subsequently be sent to the client for use by the javascript WebAuthn API
  2. Wax.register/3: takes into parameter the response of the WebAuthn javascript API and the challenge generated in step 1, and verifies it

Since the challenge generated in step 1 must be passed as a parameter in step 2, it is required to persist it on the server side, for instance in the session:

# generating a challenge

challenge = Wax.new_registration_challenge(login, [])

conn
|> put_session(:challenge, challenge)
|> render(register_key_page, challenge: challenge.bytes)
# the challenge is to be sent on the client one way or another
# this can be direct within the HTML, or using an API call

to be then retrieved when verifying the assertion:

challenge = get_session(conn, :challenge)

case Wax.register(attestation_object, client_data_json, challenge) do
    {:ok, {key, _}} ->
        # success case

    {:error, _} ->
        # verification failure
end

In the success case, a server will save the credential id (generated by the WebAuthn javascript call) and the cose key in its user database for use for authentication.

The key is a map that looks like:

%{
  -3 => <<182, 81, 183, 218, 92, 107, 106, 120, 60, 51, 75, 104, 141, 130,
    119, 232, 34, 245, 84, 203, 246, 165, 148, 179, 169, 31, 205, 126, 241,
    188, 241, 176>>,
  -2 => <<89, 29, 193, 225, 4, 234, 101, 162, 32, 6, 15, 14, 130, 179, 223,
    207, 53, 2, 134, 184, 178, 127, 51, 145, 57, 180, 104, 242, 138, 96, 27,
    221>>,
  -1 => 1,
  1 => 2,
  3 => -7
}

It probably doesn't need to be searchable or indexed, which is why one can store as a binary. To convert back and forth Elixir data structures to binary and store the keys in a database (SQL, for instance), take a look at the Erlang functions term_to_binary/1 and binary_to_term/1.

For further information, refer to the Wax module documentation.

Authentication

The process is quite similar, with 2 functions for authentication:

  1. Wax.new_authentication_challenge/2: generates a challenge from a list of (credential id, key) saved during the registration processes. It also has to be sent to the client for use by the javascript WebAuthn API
  2. Wax.authenticate/5: to be called to verify the WebAuthn javascript API response with the returned data (composed of signature, authenticator data, etc.) with the challenge generated in step 1

This also requires storing the challenge:

cred_ids_and_keys = UserStore.get_keys(username)

challenge = Wax.new_authentication_challenge(cred_ids_and_keys, [])

conn
|> put_session(:authentication_challenge, challenge)
|> render(auth_verify_page, challenge: challenge.bytes, creds: cred_ids_and_keys)
# the challenge is to be sent on the client one way or another
# this can be direct within the HTML, or using an API call

to be passed as a paramter to the Wax.authenticate/5 function:

challenge = get_session(conn, :authentication_challenge)

case Wax.authenticate(raw_id, authenticator_data, sig, client_data_json, challenge) do
    {:ok, _} ->
        # ok, user authenticated

    {:error, _} ->
        # invalid WebAuthn response
end

For further information, refer to the Wax module documentation.

Options

The options are set when generating the challenge (for both registration and authentication). Options can be configured either globally in the configuration file or when generating the challenge. Some also have default values.

Option values set during challenge generation take precedence over globally configured options, which takes precedence over default values.

These options are:

OptionTypeApplies toDefault valueNotes
attestation"none" or "direct"<ul style="margin:0"><li>registration</li></ul>"none"
originString.t()<ul style="margin:0"><li>registration</li><li>authentication</li></ul>Mandatory. Example: https://www.example.com
rp_idString.t() or :auto<ul style="margin:0"><li>registration</li><li>authentication</li></ul>If set to :auto, automatically determined from the origin (set to the host)With :auto, it defaults to the full host (e.g.: www.example.com). This option allow you to set the rp_id to another valid value (e.g.: example.com)
user_verification"discouraged", "preferred" or "required"<ul style="margin:0"><li>registration</li><li>authentication</li></ul>"preferred"
trusted_attestation_types[Wax.Attestation.type()]<ul style="margin:0"><li>registration</li></ul>[:none, :basic, :uncertain, :attca, :self]
verify_trust_rootboolean()<ul style="margin:0"><li>registration</li></ul>trueOnly for u2f and packed attestation. tpm attestation format is always checked against metadata
acceptable_authenticator_statuses[Wax.Metadata.TOCEntry.StatusReport.status()]<ul style="margin:0"><li>registration</li></ul>[:fido_certified, :fido_certified_l1, :fido_certified_l1plus, :fido_certified_l2, :fido_certified_l2plus, :fido_certified_l3, :fido_certified_l3plus]The :update_available status is not whitelisted by default
timeoutnon_neg_integer()<ul style="margin:0"><li>registration</li><li>authentication</li></ul>20 * 60The validity duration of a challenge
android_key_allow_software_enforcementboolean()<ul style="margin:0"><li>registration</li></ul>falseWhen registration is a Android key, determines whether software enforcement is acceptable (true) or only hardware enforcement is (false)
silent_authentication_enabledboolean()<ul style="margin:0"><li>authentication</li></ul>falseSee https://github.com/fido-alliance/conformance-tools-issues/issues/434

FIDO2 Metadata service (MDS) configuration

Configuring the access token

The FIDO Alliance provides with a list of metadata statements of certified FIDO2 authenticators. A metadata statement contains trust anchors (root certificates) to verify attestations. Wax can automatically keep this metadata up to date but needs a access token which is provided by the FIDO Alliance. One can request it here: https://mds2.fidoalliance.org/tokens/.

Once the token has been granted, it has to be added in the configuration file (consider adding it to your *.secret.exs files) with the :metadata_access_token key. The update frquency can be configured with the :metadata_update_interval key (in seconds, defaults to 12 hours). Example:

config/dev.exs:

use Mix.Config

config :wax_,
  metadata_update_interval: 3600,

config/dev.secret.exs:

use Mix.Config

config :wax_,
  metadata_access_token: "d4904acd10a36f62d7a7d33e4c9a86628a2b0eea0c3b1a6c"

Note that some FIDO1 certififed authenticators, such as Yubikeys, won't be present in this list and Wax doesn't load data from the former ("FIDO1") metadata Web Service. The FIDO Alliance plans to provides with a web service having both FIDO1 and FIDO2, but there is no roadmap as of September 2019.

During the registration process, when trust root is verified against FIDO2 metadata, only metadata entries whose last status is whitelisted by the :acceptable_authenticator_statuses will be used. Otherwise a warning is logged and the registration process fails. Metadata is still loaded for debugging purpose in the :wax_metadata ETS table.

Configuring the HTTP adapter

Wax uses Tesla to retrieve metadata and certificate revocation lists.

Since Tesla's default adapter is :httpc, which performs insecure HTTPS request, it is highly recommended to configure another secure adapter. For instance, if you're are already using Hackney in your project (type mix deps.tree to determine which HTTP libraries are already used), then configure Tesla the following way:

config/config.exs

config :tesla, adapter: Tesla.Adapter.Hackney

See Tesla's documentation for more information.

Loading FIDO2 metadata from a directory

In addition to the FIDO2 metadata service, it is possible to load metadata from a directory. To do so, the :metadata_dir application environment variable must be set to one of:

  • a String.t(): the path to the directory containing the metadata files
  • an atom(): in this case, the files are loaded from the "fido2_metadata" directory of the private ("priv/") directory of the application (whose name is the atom)

In both case, Wax tries to load all files (even directories and other special files).

Example configuration

config :wax_,
  origin: "http://localhost:4000",
  rp_id: :auto,
  metadata_dir: :my_application

will try to load all files of the "priv/fido2_metadata/" of the :my_application as FIDO2 metadata statements. On failure, a warning is emitted.

Security considerations

  • Make sure to understand the implications of not using attested credentials before accepting none or self attestation types, or disabling it for packed and u2f formats by disabling it with the verify_trust_root option
  • This library has not be reviewed by independent security / FIDO2 specialists - use it at your own risks or blindly trust its author! If you're knowledgeable about FIDO2 and willing to help reviewing it, please contact the author

Changes

See CHANGELOG.md.

Support of FIDO2

Server Requirements and Transport Binding Profile

2. Registration and Attestations

  • [x] Mandatory: registration support
  • [x] Mandatory: random challenge
  • 2.1. Validating Attestation
    • [x] Mandatory: attestation validation
    • [x] Mandatory: attestation certificate chains (note: can be disabled through an option)
    • [x] Mandatory: validation of attestation through the FIDO Metadata Service
  • 2.2. Attestation Types
    • [x] Mandatory: basic attestation
    • [x] Mandatory: self attestation
    • [x] Mandatory: private CA attestation
    • [ ] Optional: elliptic curve direct anonymous attestation
  • 2.3. Attestation Formats
    • [x] Mandatory: packed attestation
    • [x] Mandatory: TPM attestation
    • [x] Optional: Android key attestation
    • [x] Mandatory: U2F attestation
    • [x] Mandatory: Android Safetynet attestation

3. Authentication and Assertions

  • [x] Mandatory: authentication
  • [x] Mandatory: random challenge
  • [x] Mandatory: assertion signature validation
  • [x] Mandatory: TUP verification (note: and also user verified, through an option)

4. Communication Channel Requirements

  • [ ] Optional: TokenBinding support (won't be supported following Chrome drop of the now dead token binding standard)

5. Extensions

  • [x] Mandatory: registration and authentication support without extension
  • [ ] Optional: extension support
  • [ ] Optional: appid extension support

6. Other

  • [x] Mandatory: RS1 (RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 w/ SHA-1) algorithm support
  • [x] Mandatory: RS256 (RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 w/ SHA-256) algorithm support
  • [x] Optional: RS384 (RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 w/ SHA-384) algorithm support
  • [x] Optional: RS512 (RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 w/ SHA-512) algorithm support
  • [x] Optional: PS256 (RSASSA-PSS w/ SHA-256) algorithm support
  • [x] Optional: PS384 (RSASSA-PSS w/ SHA-384) algorithm support
  • [x] Optional: PS512 (RSASSA-PSS w/ SHA-512) algorithm support
  • [x] Mandatory: ES256 (ECDSA using P-256 and SHA-256) algorithm support
  • [x] Optional: ES384 (ECDSA using P-384 and SHA-384) algorithm support
  • [x] Optional: ES512 (ECDSA using P-521 and SHA-512) algorithm support
  • [x] Optional: EdDSA algorithm support
  • [x] Optional: ES256K (ECDSA using P-256K and SHA-256) algorithm support
  • [ ] Mandatory: compliance with the FIDO privacy principles (note: out-of-scope, to be implemented by the server using the Wax library)

7. Transport Binding Profile

FIDO Metadata Service

3.1.8 Metadata TOC object processing rules

  • [ ] TOC verification against the x5u attribute (note: doesn't seem to be used)
  • [x] TOC verification against the x5c attribute
  • [x] TOC CRLs verification
  • [x] Loading and verification of metadata statements against the hased value of the TOC
  • [x] Handling of the status of the authenticator (through whitelisting, see the :acceptable_authenticator_statuses option)