Crosswake Compatibility Boundaries
View SourceCrosswake keeps runtime ownership explicit per route and keeps compatibility truth separate from package versions.
Compatibility Axes
Crosswake evaluates compatibility through separate contract axes:
manifest_schema_versionbridge_protocol_versionnative_runtime_version
The shell may parse a manifest and still refuse activation or bridge execution if a route requires a newer shell runtime, a newer bridge major, a missing declared pack, or an unavailable capability version. Crosswake does not silently downgrade those cases into generic WebView behavior.
Package Versions Versus Compatibility Axes
Package versions alone do not answer support or rebuild questions. package versions alone do not answer support or rebuild questions.
crosswakeuses package SemVer for Hex publication- compatibility truth stays on
manifest_schema_version,bridge_protocol_version, andnative_runtime_version - capability families keep their own major/minor expectations
- support claims come from the generated support matrix and doctor output, not from package numbers alone
Runtime ownership still stays explicit per route. Package class does not imply native authority over a route.
Companion Compatibility Contract
Future companions must declare minimum compatible ranges for:
crosswakecoremanifest_schema_versionbridge_protocol_versionnative_runtime_version- any exposed capability-family majors
That keeps companion support explicit and fail closed instead of pretending every published package version can interoperate safely.
Storefront-sensitive commerce work follows this contract. Provider adapters and native SDK wrappers carry native or companion rebuild required guidance and explicit compatibility declarations, rather than prose-only notes. You must rebuild when commerce companion prerequisites change.
Concretely, the canonical commerce corridor rebuild truth (mirrored from Crosswake.SupportMatrix.commerce_corridors/0) is:
paywall_entryandaccount_management—native_rebuild_required: false. Phoenix-owned core route/manifest metadata changes do not require a native shell rebuild.purchase_intentandrestore_intent—native_rebuild_required: true. Native adapter or provider SDK code changes require rebuilding and resubmitting the host shell.
See guides/commerce.md for the full corridor ownership matrix and proof-class posture.
Release Choreography
Use the compatibility axes to describe release impact.
- Manifest-shape break: bump
manifest_schema_versionmajor, then update support docs and doctor before release. - Bridge-envelope break: bump
bridge_protocol_versionmajor, then publish compatible shell artifacts before support expands. - Native-code or entitlement change: move to a new
native_runtime_versionline and mark the change as rebuild required. - Compatibility-window narrowing: treat it as
compatibility-bump only, publish the new supported ranges, and keep older combinations fail closed.
Rebuild Guidance
Crosswake enforces explicit rebuild guidance to maintain honest support claims and compatibility boundaries:
- Bumping
native_runtime_version: Mandates an explicit native rebuild and submission to the app stores. - Bumping
bridge_protocol_version: Requires generating and publishing a compatible shell artifact update, followed by an explicit rebuild. - Adding new
companionpackages: Especially native-backed ones, requires updating the shell project dependencies, adjusting entitlements, and performing an explicit native rebuild and submission.
You cannot bypass these rules with hot code pushes or cached manifests. Changing runtime native dependencies or bridge protocols requires a full native build cycle.
Runtime Line Rules
iOS and Android shell artifacts publish against the same runtime line even if their platform-specific artifact build numbers differ.
If a change touches native code, permissions, entitlements, registration, or packaged
runtime behavior, it belongs to the native or companion rebuild required class.
Manifest Sources
Crosswake recognizes bundled, cached, and remote manifest sources.
bundledis guaranteed boot truth shipped in the binary.cachedis previously trusted manifest truth retained by the app.remotemay refine behavior only inside the shipped native runtime and versioned compatibility contract.
Remote updates stay constrained to versioned replacement or explicitly versioned companion data.
Failure Posture
Crosswake activation is fail-closed.
- Route activation runs manifest-first and native-first before any web container loads.
- Unsupported or unsafe routes land on a Crosswake-owned
route unavailablesurface. - Bridge execution is request/reply-only and denies side effects on
compatibility_mismatch,origin_denied,inactive_route,undeclared_capability,unavailable_capability, andpack_incompatible.
Change Class Examples
- Change class
docs-only: clarify a guide or release note without changing compatibility declarations. - Change class
core-only/no native rebuild: tighten manifest validation while keeping the same supported axis values. - Change class
compatibility-bump only: narrow a supported shell/core window so older combinations fail closed. - Change class
native or companion rebuild required: change generated shell code, entitlements, or runtime dependencies.
Proof Boundary
Published shell support is proof-backed by:
bash script/verify_phase5_example_hosts.shbash script/verify_offline_contract.sh
Generated-host verification remains part of the compatibility contract:
script/verify_generated_ios_shell.shscript/verify_generated_android_shell.sh
Run mix crosswake.doctor for manifest, support, and release-policy posture, then
run mix crosswake.doctor --native-checks to re-run the generated-host hooks against
your local shell projects.
Non-Goals
- Generic WebView-wrapper positioning
- Lockstep repo-wide version theater
- High-frequency bridge-driven state loops
- Broad support claims beyond the proof-oriented matrix